Do you audit for both Polygon PoS and zkEVM?

Yes. We audit protocols on both networks. Each has different security properties: PoS bridge trust assumptions differ from zkEVM proof verification.

Are there Polygon-specific vulnerabilities?

The core Solidity vulnerabilities are the same, but Polygon-specific risks include bridge interactions, PoS validator trust assumptions, and zkEVM behavioral differences from standard EVM.

Polygon Smart Contract Security Audits

Polygon's ecosystem spans DeFi, gaming, NFTs, and enterprise applications across both PoS and zkEVM networks. With billions in TVL and millions of active users, security gaps in Polygon protocols are actively targeted.

$1.2B+

TVL on Polygon PoS

1M+

Daily active addresses

300+

DeFi protocols

Request an Audit

Polygon-Specific Security Risks

Every blockchain has unique security properties. These are the risks specific to building on Polygon.

Dual Network Complexity

Polygon operates both a PoS sidechain and a zkEVM rollup. Protocols may deploy on one or both, each with different security properties and bridge mechanisms.

Bridge Security

Assets bridged to Polygon PoS rely on a validator bridge with different trust assumptions than Ethereum L1. Bridge interactions are a critical audit focus.

zkEVM-Specific Risks

Polygon zkEVM introduces ZK proof verification into the security model. EVM equivalence is not identical. Subtle differences can affect contract behavior.

High User Volume

Polygon's low fees attract high transaction volume, amplifying the impact of MEV, front-running, and oracle manipulation attacks.

Notable Exploits on Polygon

Real incidents that demonstrate why Polygon security audits matter.

Polygon Plasma Bridge Bug

$850M at risk2021

Critical vulnerability in Plasma bridge exit logic (responsibly disclosed, no funds lost).

QiDAO (via Superfluid)

$13M2022

Superfluid vesting contract exploit drained QiDAO-related tokens on Polygon.

Frequently Asked Questions

Relevant Audit Services

Solidity Audits

Line-by-line Solidity smart contract audits combining manual review, static analysis, and fuzzing. Severity-rated findings with actionable remediation.

Formal Verification

Mathematical formal verification of smart contract properties. Prove critical invariants hold under all possible inputs, not just tested ones.

Bridge Audits

Security audits for cross-chain bridges and messaging protocols. Multi-chain validation, relay security, and asset custody reviewed by experienced auditors.

Related Research

research

What $10.77 Billion in Hacks Reveals About Audit Effectiveness

Analysis of 100 largest protocol hacks totaling $10.77B. Only 20% were audited, but the ones that were share a pattern. Firm comparison, verified exploit data, pricing, and evaluation criteria.

Building on Polygon?

Get a security audit from a team that understands Polygon's architecture. We respond within 24 hours.

Request an Audit